کتاب
1. انصاری، باقر، شیما عطار و امیرحسین صالحی، حقوق دادهها و هوش مصنوعی: مفاهیم و چالشها، چ 2، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، ۱۴۰۲.
References:
Books
1. Ansari, Bagher, Shima Attar and Amir Hossein Salehi, Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Challenges,. 2nd ed. Tehran: Sherkat-e Sahāmi-ye Enteshār, 2023. (in persian)
2. Ausloos, Jef, The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law, Oxford University Press, 2020.
3. Frantziou, Eleni, The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights in the European Union: A Constitutional Analysis, Oxford University Press, 2019.
4. Lyon, David, Surveillance after Snowden, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
5. Moore, M. and D. Tambini, eds., Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Oxford University Press, 2018.
6. Pollicino, Oreste and Marco Bassini, “Free Speech, Defamation and the Limits to Freedom of Expression in the EU: A Comparative Analysis”, in Research Handbook on EU Internet Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014,.
7. Radin, Margaret Jane, Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law, Princeton University Press, 2013.
8. Srnicek, N., Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Articles
9. Anupam, Chander, Margot E. Kaminski, and William McGeveran, “Catalyzing Privacy Law”, Minnesota Law Review, No. 105, 2021, pp. 1733-1802. Doi: 10.24926/265535.4205
10. Coase, Ronald Harry, “The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1974, pp. 384-391.
11. Crawford, Susan, “First Amendment Common Sense”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, 2014, pp. 2343-2391.
12. De Búrca, Gràinne, “After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2013, pp. 168-184.doi: 10.1177/1023263X1302000202
13. Douglas-Scott, Sionaidh, “The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon”, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2011, pp. 645-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngr038
14. Elkin-Koren, Niva and Eldar Haber, “Governance by Proxy: Cyber Challenges to Civil Liberties”, Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 82, 2016, pp. 105-162.
15. Fernandez, Jonathan A., “A Comparative Analysis of Privacy and Humanitarian Rights of Citizens against Data Collection through Artificial Intelligence between the European Union and the United States: Will ChatGPT Own Your Data?,” Journal of international law & comparative studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2024, pp. 153-174.
16. Floridi, Luciano, “On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy”, Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2016, pp. 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0220-8
17. Gellert, Raphael, “Understanding the Notion of Risk in the General Data Protection Regulation”, Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2018, pp. 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.12.003
18. Ip, Eric C., “Globalization and the Future of the Law of the Sovereign State”, International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2010, pp. 636-655.
19. Kerr, Orin S., “The Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 111, No. 3, 2012, pp. 311-354. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq033
20. Kuczerawy, Aleksandra, “The Power of Positive Thinking, Intermediary Liability and the Effective Enjoyment of the Right to Freedom of Expression”, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2017, pp. 226-237.
21. Mehra, Salil K. and Marketa Trimble, “Secondary Liability, ISP Immunity, and Incumbent Entrenchment”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 62, No. supp1-1, 2014, pp. 685-705. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0041
22. Mortelmans, Kamiel, “The Common Market, the Internal Market and the Single Market, What’s in a Market?”, Common Market Law Review. Vol. 35, No. 1, 1998, p. 101-136. https://doi.org/10.54648/159616
23. Pasquale, Frank, “Internet Nondiscrimination Principles: Commercial Ethics for Carriers and Search Engines”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 2008, 2008, pp. 263-300.
24. Pollicino, Oreste, “Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Transition from the World of Atoms to the Word of Bits: The Case of Freedom of Speech”, European Law Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2019, pp. 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12311
25. Rouvroy, Antoinette and Yves Poullet, “The Right to Informational Self-Determination and the Value of Self-Development: Reassessing the Importance of Privacy for Democracy”, eds. Serge Gutwirth, Yves Poullet, Paul Hert, Cécile Terwangne and Sjaak Nouwt, (Conference paper) Series: Reinventing Data Protection?. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009, pp. 45-76.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9498-9_2
26. Schwartz, Paul M., and Karl-Nikolaus Peifer, “Transatlantic Data Privacy Law”, The Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 106, No. 1, 2017, pp. 115-179.
27. Tushnet, Mark, “The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law”, Virginia Journal of International Law. Vol. 49, No. 4, 2008, pp. 985-1006.
Documents & Reports
28. European Parliament and Council, “Electronic Commerce Directive: Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on Certain Legal Aspects of Information Society Services, in Particular Electronic Commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on Electronic Commerce)”, Directive 2000/31/EC (European Union directive, June 08, 2000). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/31/oj/eng/ (Last visited 24/07/2025)
29. European Parliament and European Council, “Data Retention Directive: Directive on the Retention of Data Generated or Processed in Connection with the Provision of Publicly Available Electronic Communications Services or of Public Communications Networks”, European Union Directive: Directive 2002/58/EC (Official Journal of the European Union, March 15, 2006). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/24/oj/eng/ (Last visited 24/07/2025)
30. European Union, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Democracy Action Plan”, COM/2020/790 final (Brussels: European Commission, December 03, 2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0790/ (Last visited 24/07/2025)
31. European Union, “Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the “Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Certain Legal Aspects of Electronic Commerce in the Internal Market””, OJ C 169 (Official Journal of the European Union, June 16, 1999), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:51999AC0457. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:51999AC0457/ (Last visited 24/07/2025)
32. European Union, “Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation),” COM/2012/011 final, 2012.
Cases
33. Abrams v. United States, No. 250 U.S. 616, Docket no. 316 (Supreme Court of the United States November 10, 1919).
34. Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindqvist, No. C-101/01 (Göta hovrätt - Sweden, November 06, 2003).
35. Gomez v. Mark Zuckenburg Facebook, Inc, (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK December 03, 2020).
36. Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL and Google France SARL v Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others), Joined Cases C‑236/08, C‑237/08 and C‑238/08 (Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) March 23, 2010).
37. Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12 (European Court of Justice May 13, 2014).
38. Jan LEWIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. H041127 (Court of Appeal, Sixth District, California. December 28, 2015).
39. L’Oréal SA v. eBay International AG, No. C-324/09 (High Court of Justice (England & Wales) July 12, 2011).
40. Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 587 U.S. (more) 139 S. Ct. 1921; 204 L. Ed. 2d 405 (Supreme Court of the United States June 17, 2019).
41. Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 582 U.S. 98 (Supreme Court of the United States June 19, 2017).
42. Reno v. ACLU, No. 521 U.S. 844 (Rehnquist Court June 26, 1997).
43. Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM), No. C-70/10 (Cour d’appel de Bruxelles November 24, 2011).
44. Schenck v. United States, No. 249 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court of the United States March 03, 1919).
45. United States v. Rumely, No. 345 U.S. 41 (U.S. Supreme Court March 09, 1953).
46. Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme, No. 433 F.3d 1199 (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit January 12, 2006).
Acts and Legislations
47. “EU-US Trade and Technology Council Inaugural Joint Statement” (The President of the United States of America, 29 September 2021).
48. “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship” (The President of the United States of America, May 28, 2020).
49. “Promoting Competition in the American Economy” (The President of the United States of America, July 9, 2021).
50. The 105th United States Congress, “Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)”, 17 U.S.C. (October 28, 1998).
51. The 65th United States Congress “Espionage Act of 1917”, No. Pub. L. 65–24, United States federal law (June 15, 1917).
52. United States Congress, “Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA)”, 47 U.S.C (June 15, 1995).
