parative Study of the Nature of the Reassuring Message of the Competition Council

Karimi Ghahderijani, Maedeh; Abdullah, Rajabi

doi:10.48308/eclr.2025.239204.1149

parative Study of the Nature of the Reassuring Message of the Competition Council

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Maedeh Karimi Ghahderijani ¹ ^¶

Rajabi Abdullah ²

¹ L.L.M., University of Tehran: Caspian International Campus, Gilan, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Tehran: Farabi College, Tehran, Iran Corresponding Author Email: rajabya@ut.ac.ir

https://doi.org/10.48308/eclr.2025.239204.1149

Abstract

The institution of the Reassuring Message, established in Article 49 of the Implementation Law of the General Policies of Article 44 of the Constitution, is a significant innovation in Iran’s competition law, specifically designed to address mergers and acquisitions by enhancing predictability, increasing legal certainty, and preventing anti-competitive practices in these processes. This multifaceted institution combines advisory, preventive, provisional and credible features to guide market participants' conduct and promote transparency in economic transactions. However, in its current form, the Reassuring Message lacks binding legal effect on third parties and the scope and conditions of their right to object remain unclear. In the comparative section, the Reassuring Message is analyzed alongside the Business Review Letter and the prior approval policy in U.S. competition law, as well as the comfort letter mechanism under European Union competition law. Their strengths are examined in terms of relative binding force, preventive role, and public disclosure. Finally, the study emphasizes the necessity of clearly defining the Reassuring Message, drafting comprehensive and systematic regulations, specifying clear legal consequences, designing an effective accountability mechanism, and mandating the publication of messages with due regard to confidentiality. These recommendations aim to enhance the efficiency and consolidate the position of this institution within Iran’s competition law framework.

Keywords

Reassuring Message

Competition Council

General Policies of Article 44 of the Constitution

Prevention of Anti-Competitive Practices

Comparative Competition Law

eferences

Books
1. Ghafari Farsani, Behnam, Competition Law and Its Enforcement Mechanisms, 2^nd, Tehran: Mizan Publishing, 2019. (in Persian)
2. Groves, Peter J., Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, London & Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1997.
3. Jafari Langaroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Comprehensive Work on Legal Terminology, vol. 3, 6^th, Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publishing, 2008. (in Persian)
4. Matin Daftari, Ahmad, Civil and Commercial Procedure, vol. 2, 2^nd, Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 1999. (in Persian)
5. Mohajeri, Ali, Civil Procedure Law in the Current Legal Order, 1^st, Tehran: Fekr-Sazan Publishing, 2011. (in Persian)
6. Mortazavi Birjandi, Abdolhamid, Competition Law and Its Procedure, Tehran: Judiciary — Office of Press & Publications, 2023. (in Persian)
7. Motta, Massimo, Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
8. Nahrini, Fereydoun, Interim Injunction in Iranian Law: A Comparative Study, 1^st, Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Library, 2008. (in Persian)
9. Sadrzadeh Afshar, Seyyed Mohsen, Civil and Commercial Procedure of the Public and Revolutionary Courts, 2, 5^th edition., Tehran: Jahad-e Daneshgahi Publishing, 2001. (in Persian)
10. Sayyah, Ahmad, The New Comprehensive Great Dictionary (Translation of Al-Munjid), 1, 18^th edition., Tehran: Eslam Publishing, 1996. (in Persian)
11. Shams, Abdollah, Civil Procedure, vol. 3, 35^th, Tehran: Darak, 2021. (in Persian)
12. Shiravi, Abdolhossein, Economic Law, 2^nd, Tehran: SAMT, SH 1400. (in Persian)
13. Veljanovski, Cento G., Economic Principles of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
14. Vincent, J. et al., Nouveau Code de Procédure Civile, Vol. 1, 95th edition, Paris: Dalloz, 2003.
15. Yousefzadeh, Morteza, Civil Procedure, 3^rd, Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar, 2015. (in Persian)
Articles
1. Abhari, Hamid & Reza Zarei, “Formal Characteristics and Conditions of an Application for a Temporary Injunction in Iranian Civil Procedure,” Private Law Studies, Vol. 40, No. 42, 2010, PP. 1–17. (in Persian) doi: 1001.1.25885618.1389.40.101.1.2
2. Bradford, A.; Chilton, A. S.; Megaw, C.; & Sokol, N., “Competition Law Gone Global: Introducing the Comparative Competition Law and Enforcement Datasets”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2019, pp. 411–443. doi:10.1111/jels.12215
3. Cousy, Herman A., “Risks and Uncertainties in the Law of Tort”, in Tort and Insurance Yearbook (European Tort Law 2006), European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, Wien, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77572-1_1
4. Ebrahimi, Bibi Rahimeh, “Studies in Fiqh and Islamic Law,” Studies in Fiqh and Islamic Law, Vol. 14, No. 27, Summer 2022, PP. 7–28. (in Persian) doi: 22075/feqh.2021.22674.2769
5. Ebrahimi, Omid & Abbas Sheikh-ol-Eslami, “Legal Assessment of the Organizational Structure and Functions of the Competition Council,” Quarterly of Public Law Studies, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2019, PP. 695–715. (in Persian) doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2018.244557.1605
6. Farsi, Amir-Mohammad, “Legal Analysis of Security for the Claim and Interim Injunction in Civil Procedure: Processes and Criteria,” Legal Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, Winter 2024, PP. 495–508. (in Persian) doi: https://doi.org/10.48309/jlps.2024.492812.1281
7. Hosseini, Abdolrahim, “Comparative Study of the Shariʿa Ruling in the Science of Uṣūl (Principles),” Fiqh Researches, Vol. 11, No. 2, Summer 2015, PP. 367–388. (in Persian) doi: 22059/jorr.2015.55618
8. Khoshnoudi, Reza & Mina Hosseini, “The Legal Nature of the Competition Council and Appeals from Its Decisions,” Legal Researches, Vol. 19, no. 75 (serial no. 75), Khordad 2016, PP. 201–225. (in Persian) https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_56228.html
9. Mirqeysar, Seyyed Rouhollah, “The Role of Ḥaqīqiya Case in Usool al-Fiqh (Principles of Jurisprudence),” Islamic Studies: Fiqh & Usool, year 46, serial No. 99, Winter 2014, PP. 197–220. (in Persian) doi:22067/fiqh.v46i19.20803
10. Mirzadeh Kouhshahi, Nader, “Judicial Supervision of the Competition Council and Related Institutions by the Administrative Justice Court,” Comparative Research of Islamic and Western Law, Vol. 9, No. 3, serial No. 33, Mehr 2022, PP. 355–384. (in Persian) doi: 22091/csiw.2022.8269.2287
11. Mofakhari, Roya; Om-al-Banin Ramadanzadeh & Seyyed Hassan Hosseini-Moghadam, “Analysis of the Competition Council’s Powers to Terminate Contracts Arising from Abuse of Dominant Position,” New Researches in Administrative Law, year 6, Summer 2024, No. 19, PP. 229–258. (in Persian) doi: 22034/mral.2023.2004553.1482
12. Mohammadzadeh Vaqani, “The Principle of Precaution in Agricultural and Environmental Law,” Quarterly of Private Law Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2015, PP. 471–486. (in Persian) doi: 22059/jlq.2015.55030
13. Mostafavi, Seyyed Kazem, “The Nature of Judgement,” Law Quarterly, Faculty of Law & Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 1, Spring 2009, PP. 289–309. (in Persian) doi: 1001.1.25885618.1388.39.1.14.8
14. Rajabi, Abdollah, “Conditions and Effects of Precautionary Measures in Iranian Law,” Quarterly of Private Law Studies, Vol. 50, No. 4, Winter 2020, PP. 678–706. (in Persian) doi: 22059/jlq.2020.273694.1007161
15. Ritchie de Larena, Lorelei, “Re-Evaluating Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property Disputes”, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 83, 2007. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol83/iss3/5
16. Rouhizadeh, Ali & Majid Abbas-Tabar, “Preventive Declaratory Ruling and Protection of Potential Patent Infringers,” Biannual Judicial Legal Views, issues 77 & 78, Autumn & Winter 2017, PP. 113–131. (in Persian) https://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-751-fa.html
17. Samami, Abdollah & Abbas Karimi, “The Nature of Interim Injunction and Its Characteristics in French Law,” Comparative Legal Research of Iran & International, Vol. 11, No. 42, Winter 2018, PP. 135–166. (in Persian) https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/alr/Article/1058004
18. Shams, Abdollah, “Cases of Issuing Interim Injunctions and Factors Influencing Their Determination,” Legal Research Journal, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, No. 39, 2004, PP. 11–47. (in Persian) https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_56570.html
19. Tavakoli, Ahmadreza, “The Nature of a Shariʿa Ruling from the Viewpoint of Imam Khomeini (r.a.),” Research on Fiqh and Islamic Law, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010, PP. 27–44. (in Persian)
20. Trebilcock, Michael J. & Iacobucci, Edward M., “Designing Competition Law Institutions: Values, Structure, and Mandate”, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2010. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol41/iss3/5
21. Ünekbaş, Selçukhan, “The Resurrection of the Comfort Letter: Back to the Future?”, Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Vol. 15, No.25, 2022, pp. 43–58. doi: 10.7172/1689‑9024.YARS.2022.15.25.2
22. Wright, Joshua D. & Ginsburg, Douglas H., “The Economic Analysis of Antitrust Consents”, European Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming), George Mason University Law & Economics Research Paper Series, No. LS 18-12. doi: 1007/s10657‑018‑9579‑6
23. Yun, John M., “Going Backwards: The FTC’s New Prior Approval Policy”, George Mason University Law & Economics Research Paper Series, Vol. 22, No. 06, 2022.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4063119

Rules & Regulations
1. Commercial Code, approved on 03 May 1932. (in Persian)
2. Executive By-laws of the Law for Facilitating the Preparation of Documents in Notary Public Offices, approved on 16 March 2008. (in Persian)
3. Executive Instruction for Articles 47, 48 & 49 of the Law on Implementation of General Policies of Article 44 of the Constitution, approved on 08 December 2018. (in Persian)
4. Instruction on the Method of Legal Inquiry and Response in the Judiciary, approved on 10 December 2019. (in Persian)
5. Law for Facilitating the Preparation of Documents in Notary Public Offices, approved on 15 August 2006. (in Persian)
6. Law of Civil Procedure of the Public and Revolutionary Courts (Civil Matters), approved on 10 April 2000. (in Persian)
7. Law of Notary Public Offices and the Association of Notaries and Daffariyan, approved on 16 July 1975. (in Persian)
8. Law on Registration of Companies, approved on 23 May 1931. (in Persian)
9. Law on the Implementation of the General Policies of Article 44 of the Constitution, approved on 28 January 2008 (With latest amendments up to up to 2023). (in Persian)
10. Regulations of Notary Public Offices, approved in 1938. (in Persian)
Documents
1. European Commission, Commission Notice on Informal Guidance Relating to Novel or Unresolved Questions Concerning Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Guidance Letters), Official Journal of the European Union, C 381/9–C 381/13, available at:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= oj:JOC_2022_381 _R_0007 (last visited 17/07/2025).
1. European Commission, DG Competition, Cases Art. 81/82 (ex 85/86) Closed by Comfort Letter, [years listed 1990–1999], available in the Annual Report on Competition Policy.
2. Federal Trade Commission, Statement on the Use of Prior Approval Provisions in Merger Orders, rescinded July 21, 2021.
3. S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Response to the Institute of International Finance Request for a Business Review, January 14, 2021.
4. “§ 50.6 Antitrust Division Business Review Procedure”, 28 CFR Ch. I (7–1–24 Edition), available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-50/section-50.6 (last visited 17/07/2025).
5. Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002, Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 1, 4 January 2003.
Cases
1. Court of First Instance, Judgment of the Fourth Chamber, 17 February 2000, Stork Amsterdam BV v Commission of the European Communities, Case T-241/97, ECLI: EU:T:2000:41, 2000, ECR II-309.
2. Stork Amsterdam BV v Commission of the European Communities, Case T-241/97, Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), 17 February 2000, ECLI: EU:T:2000:41, [2000] ECR II-309.
Thesis
1. Aslani Hajiabadi, Hamid, A Comparative Study of the Reliable Message of the Competition Council in Iranian and U.S. Law, Master’s thesis, University of Tehran (Farabi Campus), Faculty of Law, LL.M. in Law, Fiqh & Economic Law, 2024. (in Persian)
2. Haj Ebrahimi, Meysam, Legal Effects of Responses to Land/Registry Inquiries, Master’s thesis, University of Tehran (Farabi Campus), Faculty of Law, LL.M. in Law (Registration & Real Property), 2018. (in Persian)
Websites
1. Antitrust Division of the DOJ, "Seeking Opinions on Potential Conduct", The National Law Review, available at:
https://natlawreview.com/article/seeking-opinions-potential-conduct-antitrust-division-department-justice (last visited 17/07/2025).
1. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Business Review Letter, available at:
https://search.justice.gov/search?affiliate=justice-atr&query=Business +Review+Letter (last visited 17/07/2025).
1. https://nicc.gov.ir (last visited 20/07/2025).
2. IP Glossary, “Business Review Letter, ” available at:
https://www.ipglossary.com/glossary/business-review-letter/ (last visited 17/07/2025).
1. United States Department of Justice, “What is a Business Review? ”, available at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/what-business-review (last visited 20/07/2025).