Document Type : Original Article

Author

University of Kashan

Abstract

Notary must be distinguished from other professions due to some attributes so as not to disturb the rule of balance between rights and obligations. A fact that has been neglected by the legislator which has caused challenges in three stages of formation, life and end through changing two fundamental privileges of the notary, i.e. acceptance restriction and the right to introduce a successor. There is concern that by approving the aforementioned law in 2022, notary becomes an opportunity for profit seeking and speculation which will degrade the value of the official document that will lead to harmful situations increase. Additionally, Changes in the right to introduce a successor create serious concerns in the transfer of customer valuable records to the new notary. Taking advantage of the provisions of French law and remembering the characteristics of a notary, i.e. independence, lack of speculation, competence and special civil liability, is a way forward. Considering these rules turns the notary into a valuable opportunity to secure the interests of the government, its representative and the client. Utilitarianism is incompatible with lack of profit seeking. Negation of quantification is a common requirement of the independence, competence and special civil liability of the notary. Especially the relationship between trust and confidence, as the center of all these features, requires scientific criteria. The right to nominate a successor is also a suitable solution for the safe transfer of records to a new notary and a necessary condition for a new start. In a situation where this right reaches its perfection with the passage of time, the legislator's action in devaluing it is undoubtedly ignoring the rights of the notaries who have chosen a notary before the approval of Law 2022 and used the life capital in the hope of tomorrow.

Keywords

  1. References

    Books

    1. Azarpour, Ahmad, Hojati Ashrafi, Gholamreza, The collection of registration circulars up to the year 2015, Tehran: Ganj – E-Danesh, 2016. (in Persian)
    2. BOTTON, M, DI MARTINO (M.), WOLFOVSKI (J.), A practical guide for freelancers and independent workers, Paris: Enterprise editions, 1994. (in French)
    3. CASAUX, L, Carrying out several professional activities by a natural person, Law doctorate thesis, University of Toulouse, LGDJ, 1993. (in French)
    4. CHAPPUIS, J, Civil companies of notary professional, Law doctorate thesis, University of Jean Moulin Lyon III, 1969. (in French)
    5. Eskini, Rabia, Commercial Law: Generalities, Commercial Acts, Merchants and Organization of Commercial Activity, Tehran: Samt, 2021. (in Persian)
    6. HALPERIN, J.L, Lawyers and notaries in Europe. Judicial and legal professions in contemporary history, Paris : LGDJ, DL 1996. (in French)
    7. Katouzian, Nasser, Extra-Contractual Obligations Civil Liability, Vol.1, 18th editions, Tehran: University of Tehran, 2021. (in Persian)
    8. LAMBOLEY, A, Professional civil company. A new job status, Paris: Librairies techniques, 1974. (in French)
    9. LEFEBVRE, F, Mémento Civil companies, Paris : Levallois-Perret :Lefebvre, 2011-2012. (in French)
    10. MAURY, F, Implementation of legalized freelance work in the form of a company, Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2000. (in French)
    11. Mazeaud and Tunc (H.), Theoretical discussion about civil responsibility, t.1, 6e edition, Montchrestien. (in French)
    12. Rezaean, Khadijeh, The nature and principles of The notary profession, 1th edition, Tehran: Mizan, 2021. (in Persian)
    13. SAVATIER, J, Free professions legal study, Law thesis, 1946, LGDJ, 1947. (in French)
    14. Seyedi Arani, Seyed Abbas, A Comparative Study of Notaries in France and Iran (In French and Persian), Tehran: Mokhatab 2019. (in Persian)
    15. Seyedi Arani, Seyed Abbas, The professional civil company of notaries (From its inception in France to its acceptance in Iran), Tehran: Mizan, 2017. (in Persian)
    16. Sotiudeh Tehrani, Hasan, Commercial Law, Vol; 1, 40th edition, Tehran: Dadgostar, 2021. (in Persian)
    17. Tabatabai Motamani, Manoochehr, Administrative Law, 25th editions, Tehran: Samt, 2022. (in Persian)
    18. VACHET, G, Running a liberal activity. Employee - independent, Published at Liberales professions, Paris: LGDJ, 1998. (in French)

    Articles

    1. AUGUET,Y, A "civil customer can be the subject of a goodwill assignment contract", D.2001. (in French)
    2. Beigi Habib‌abadi, M, " Provision of Legal Services in the Form of Joint Stock Companies, Research Report of Judicial Investigations, Research Institute of the Judiciary, Private Law Research Institute”, Commercial Law Group, (in Persian)
    3. BOUGNOUX, A," Civil companies-Generalities-Basic characteristics of a civil company-Different types of civil companies", -Cl Civil Code, Fasc. 10, 23 mars 2007. (in French)
    4. DAIGRE, J.J, "The joint liability of the professional civil partnership continues in case of professional fault of the partner even if the composition of the partnership changes". note sous arrêt cass., 3e civ., 24 avril 2003, Bull. Joly, 1 juillet 2003. (in French)
    5. DAIGRE, J.J, "Perform in a multi-professional group", Published in Free professions in group format, France, Europe, Etats-Unis, Paris: GLN Joly éd, 1995. (in French)
    6. Dalloz, 1952. (in French)
    7. GOUYOU, R, "The benefit of the client in the implementation of freelance professions in the group", LPA, 14 mai 1993. (in French)
    8. Ismailabadi, Aa, "Professional Liability Insurance of Attorneys", Nameh Mofid, 2006, No. 55. (in Persian)
    9. Katouzian, Nasser, “The Role of Notary Offices in the Current Legal Order, Journal of the Association of Notaries and Notary Assistants, 2005, No. 56. (in Persian)
    10. MOLLE, M, at "official newspaper. Parliamentary debates, Senate", 27 juin 1966. (in French)
    11. POULPIQUET (J. de), "Notary", Rép. Civ., janvier 2009. (in French)
    12. Sam Aram, 'E, “Comparative Study of Social Insurance for Self-Employed Workers in Six European Countries, Turkey, and Iran”, Social Welfare, 2004, No. 15. (in Persian)
    13. SAVATIER, J, "Free professions today", in Implementation of free professions in the group: France, Europe, United States, actes du colloque du 29 mars 1994. (in French)
    14. SAVATIER, J, "What is The free profession", published at Projet, civilisation, travail, économie, Paris: Centre de recherche et d’action sociale, 1966. (in French)
    15. Seyedi Arani Seyed Abbas, “Participatory Performance: Protecting the Interests of Physicians and Patients in Civil Liability”, Medical Law Journal, 2022,No. 57. (in Persian)
    16. Seyedi Arani, S A, "Organizing legal institutes in the light of the characteristics of activity subject (With the benefit of comparative law)", Legal Research Quarterly, 2009, No. 90. (in Persian)
    17. Seyedi Arani, S A, “Iran's Notary Offices and The need to review their implementation method”, Private Law Studies Quarterly, 2009, No 2. (in Persian)
    18. Seyedi Arani, S A, “Organizing a notary public company in the light of the notary public representation (Using the data of comparative law)”, Legal Research Quarterly, 2022, No. 100 (in Persian)
    19. Seyedi Arani, Seyed Abbas, “Circumstance preserving the right to introduce the Deputy Registrar in the Participatory performance”, Journal of Registration law, 2021,No. 1. (in Persian)

    Cases

    1. 1re civ, 10 juillet 2002, n de pourvoi :99-20484, inédit. (in French)
    2. 3e civ., 24 avril 2003: Bull. civ., III, 2003, no 83. (in French)
    3. civ., 21 juillet 1921, D. 1925, I, 29. (in French)
    4. Ruling No. 104, dated 23/02/1386 (13 May 2007), Administrative Justice Tribunal. (in Persian)
    5. Ruling No. 9701327, dated 03/12/1398 (22 February 2020), Administrative Justice Tribunal. (in Persian)
    6. Rulings No. 2750 to 2753, dated 09/09/1398 (30 November 2019), Administrative Justice Tribunal. (in Persian)
    7. Unified Ruling No. 576, dated 25/07/1371 (16 October 1992), Supreme Court. (in Persian)
    8. Unified Ruling No. 607, dated 20/06/1375 (10 September 1996), Supreme Court. (in Persian)