A comparative study on the effect of

Abdipour Fard, Ebrahim; Rezaei, Ruholla

doi:10.48308/eclr.2024.234976.1054

A comparative study on the effect of "intentional breach" of contract on the possibility of termination of contract

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ebrahim Abdipour Fard ¹

Ruholla Rezaei ²

¹ Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

² PhD graduated of University of Qom

https://doi.org/10.48308/eclr.2024.234976.1054

Abstract

_{Contract termination is a severe remedy that terminates the legal life of the contract. Therefore, in most legal systems, it is used as the last resort against breach of contract. Accordingly, one of the conditions for application of this remedy is the severity of breach, which is referred to in different legal systems with similar titles such as "fundamental" or "material" breach, but a normal breach of contract can’t be a sufficient reason to terminate it.}
_{In order to terminate the contract, in national legal systems and international trade law, various criteria have been devised to determine the severity of the breach. One of these criteria is "intentionality" of breach. In fact, intentional breach destroys the trust relationship between the parties and normally deprives the obligee from relying on contract performance. Therefore, contract governing law should entitle him to terminate the contractual relationship as one of the remedies.}
_{However, studied legal systems' approaches are different in this regard. In some legal documents such as PECL, DCFR and PICC, deliberate breach has been explicitly considered as fundamental breach. In new France and Germany civil code, the concept of breach severity is not explained but these countries judicial precedent requires intentionality as one of the criteria. In common law, intentionality of the breach is a component in addition to other circumstances which may justify contract termination. In Iran's law severity of breach is not necessary for contract termination and as a result it doesn't matter whether the breach was intentional or not. Nevertheless, according to jurisprudential principles regarding contractual and non-contractual civil liability, it is possible to distinguish between intentional and unintentional breach of contract.}

Keywords

Termination of contract

Intentional breach

Sever breach

Material breach

Remedy

- انگلیسی

-Book
1. Cartwright, John, Reforming the French Law of Obligations Comparative Reflections on the Avant-projet de réforme du droit des obligations et de la prescription (‘the Avant-projet Catala’), (Hart Publishing, 2009).
2. Chengwei, Liu and Marie Stefanini Newman, Remedies for Non Performance, Perspectives from CISG, UNIDROIT Principles and PECL, (N.Y, Juris Publishing, 2007).
3. Christoph, Brunner, UN Sales Convention—CISG: Commentary on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980, (Bern, 2^nd Ed, 2014).
4. Farnsworth, E.Allen, Contracts, (New York: Aspen, 4^th Ed, 2004)
5. Garner, Bryan A. Black's Law Dictionary, (Thomson Reuters, 11^th Ed, 2019).
6. Halson, Roger & David Campbell, Research Handbook on Remedies in Private Law, (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).
7. Klass, Gregory, Contract Law in the USA, (Kluwer Law International, 2^nd Ed, 2012).
8. Kötz, Hein, European Contract Law, (translated from the German by Gill Mertens and Tony Weir), (Oxford University Press, 2017).
9. Koch, Robert, Commentary on Whether the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts May Be Used to Interpret or Supplement Article 25 CISG, (Cambridge, 2007).
10. Markesinis, Basil S, Unberath, Hannes, Johnston, Angus C, The German Law of Contract. A Comparative Treatise, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2^nd Ed, 2006).
11. McKendrick, Ewan, Contract Law: Text, Cases and Materials, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 12^th Ed, 2017).
12. Peel, Edwin and G.H. Treitel, The Law of Contract, (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 14^th Ed, 2015).
13. Perillo, Joseph M, Contracts, (West Academic Publishing, 7^th Ed, 2014).
14. Rowan, Solen, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Performance, (Oxford University Press, 2012).
15. Samuel, Geoffrey, Law of Obligations and Legal Remedies, ‎ (Routledge-Cavendish, 2^nd Ed, 2001).
16. Schlechtriem, Peter, and Ingeborg Schwenzer (eds.), Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4^th Ed, 2016).
17. Treitel, Guenter, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1989).
18. Von Bar, Christian, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke, Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), (Study Group on a European Civil Code, 2009).
19. Zimmermann, Reinhard, The New German Law of Obligations: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, (Oxford University Press, 2005).
-Article
1. Perillo, Joseph M. “Restitution in the Second Restatement of Contracts”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 1 (Jan., 1981), pp. 37-51.
2. Rowan, Solene, “The new French law of contract”, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 66 (4), (2017), pp. 805-831.
3. Treitel, Guenter, “Conditions and Conditions Precedents” 106 LQR, (1990), pp. 185-197.
-فرانسوی
1. Jamin, Christophe, ‘Les conditions de la résolution du contrat: vers un modèle unique? Rapport français’ (Bruylant: Bruxelles and LGDJ: Paris, 2001).
2. Pelle, Sébastien, La réception des correctifs d'équité par le droit, (Dalloz, 2011).
3. Terré.F, Simler.P, & Lequette.Y, Droit civil—Les obligations, (Dalloz, Paris, 12^th Ed, 2019).